BlackBerry recently announced the launch of their new touch-screen tablet computer, 7 months after the most popular tablet computer; the Apple iPad was released.  One look at the specifications for the new BlackBerry PlayBook and it is easy to see just who they are trying to match and surpass, Apple.  But do they really appeal to the same consumer market?  BlackBerry has been associated with professionals, where as Apple products are seen as the forefront of modern technology available to the masses.

Is it any surprise that the PlayBook has video conferencing, quick browsing and a dual-core processor, things which can’t be found on the iPad?  The PlayBook is being released before Google and Samsung release their tablet computers, and Apple inevitably releases an updated iPad with some of the features from the iPhone 4.  BlackBerry’s first tablet computer is actually competing with the next iPad, which will more than likely be released around the same time.

BlackBerry claim their tablet to be “the first multiprocessing, multi-tasking, uncompromised browsing, enterprise ready, professional grade tablet”. Everything you want from an item that is called a PlayBook.  The PlayBook offers different options to an iPad and therefore it surely has a different target market.  When the iPad was released it was fresh, innovative and inspirational, browsing on the move, email at the touch of your hands.  Apple like the link between their technology being accessed through your fingertips the iPhone and iPod Touch being prime examples

BlackBerry has always been associated with professionals and businesses, so to release a tablet computer called the PlayBook may be seen as ironic.  However could it be aimed at a different consumer market?  An iPad is very much seen as a young product to have, with the brand’s sleek and stylish layout is a contrast to the organised and business like image BlackBerry.  So why don’t BlackBerry attempt to control the slightly older, professional market?  This would strengthen the brand image of professional technology for professional people.  With the PlayBook, Blackberry appears to have fallen into the trap of trying to beat Apple at its own game, rather than playing to its own considerable strengths and niche market.

Microsoft has announced its new line of retail stores are on schedule to open before the end of 2009, as part of their ongoing marketing strategy. Interestingly, or perhaps oddly, Microsoft claimed this week that their shops will be springing up right next door to Apple Stores, highlighting the clear head-to-head idea behind the venture.

In direct contrast to the thinking behind their newly launched search engine Bing (an unofficial acronym for “Bing Is Not Google”), Microsoft is spelling out their aims for the retail store in unambiguous terms, making it clear that it sees it as a like-for-like competitor to Apple’s store.

Whether it’ll be a good move for Microsoft remains to be seen, but there are a number of reasons why the company’s established behemoth status might just not be enough to guarantee success on the street;

1) A Zune is not an iPod

Microsoft’s proprietary products aren’t exactly exciting. If they’re going to fill the shops up with copies of Windows7, Zunes and peripherals then the doors aren’t likely to be broken down with a customer stampede.

2) If it isn’t broke…

The high streets and retail parks are awash with PCs, with the vast majority tied in with Microsoft operating systems and software packages. Adding yet another option for the consumer with a purely Microsoft store risks cannibalising the retail model that helped make the company such a success in the first place. While it might just be intentionally targeting Apple Stores, Microsoft will also need to compete against the major established PC outlets whether it wants to or not.

3) It’s not very 2009

As primarily a software company, Microsoft is in the best possible position to make a stand for the reliability and robustness of downloadable products and services. The company’s own Xbox360 games console is a positive trailblazer in downloadable content and potential – so why not take the expensive and hard-won lessons from the Xbox Live community and create a purely online centre for retailing all things Microsoft? It’s obviously the future of the market, so why not bring it forward? Launching a brand new bricks and mortar venture in 2009 seems bizarrely, almost surreally late in the day.

4) It shows competitive concern

Coming so soon after the negative retort of the the “I’m A PC” advertising campaign, it’s yet another sign that Microsoft strategises in direct response to Apple’s activities. As the vastly smaller of the two companies, being recognised and referenced in such a clear way helps to validate Apple. Maybe Microsoft would be better served by emphasising its market dominance for the right reasons. It’s not through luck that Microsoft finds itself at the top of the pile – perhaps it should be pushing the positives and getting on with its own thing, without looking over its shoulder at whatever Apple are up to.

5) It’s unknown territory

While it’s undoubtedly the biggest fish in terms of market share, Microsoft is taking a leap in the dark on the retail store front, and it couldn’t have picked on a more polished opponent. Apple has already got it right with most aspects of their retail stores. They’ve got the clinical feel of a futuristic spa waiting room, and are stacked with products like iMacs, iPhones and cinema display monitors – all of which perform a tractor-beam pull on passers-by of a certain disposition. Even the exteriors of the stores are desirable – typically chromed steel and glass framed, like artworks planted into the street by a spaceship. Microsoft has its work cut out in providing a style that will match this, let alone surpass it in direct competition.

With the first of the new stores opening in the US in the Autumn, we won’t have long to wait to see if it’s a gamble too far for Microsoft.