<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tried and tested SEO</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.green-media.com/green-notes/2007/07/10/tried-and-tested-seo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.green-media.com/green-notes/2007/07/10/tried-and-tested-seo/</link>
	<description>Web Design, SEO, Email Marketing and more.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 09:13:01 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Cutts responds to &#8220;is ranking dead?&#8221; question &#124; Green Notes</title>
		<link>http://www.green-media.com/green-notes/2007/07/10/tried-and-tested-seo/#comment-712</link>
		<dc:creator>Cutts responds to &#8220;is ranking dead?&#8221; question &#124; Green Notes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 11:50:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.green-notes.co.uk/2007/07/10/tried-and-tested-seo/#comment-712</guid>
		<description>[...] at Green Media for a long time now. We mentioned the problems with purely ranking-orientated SEO in a blog entry back in July 2007, when discussing our own approach to search. As we pointed out way back then, it should always be [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] at Green Media for a long time now. We mentioned the problems with purely ranking-orientated SEO in a blog entry back in July 2007, when discussing our own approach to search. As we pointed out way back then, it should always be [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
